Proof

Proof (directed by John Madden, based on a play by David Auburn): Rating 7/10

What happens when genius finally fades? A man who has a lot of intelligent ideas suddenly finds himself writing gibberish! Yes in most cases, old age is responsible. And in other cases, it is just a loss of the inner spark that drives a person. Proof tackles the question of mathematical genius, on how it develops, how it inspires and how it fades away. It is based on a play and I am sure that is where its strength is. As a movie, I didn’t feel it worked. It went on a single motion and never really lifted itself up. Yeah this is a good movie but nothing here grabbed me and made me care. Pi was brilliant. But that sought to explore another side of the math equation. In the end, Proof seems to be drag on a bit too long, even though the movie is around the 90 minute mark (99 minutes to be exact).

That being said, both the actresses are very good. Gwyneth Paltrow plays her role so well that you actually begin to believe she is losing her mind. Hope Davis is excellent as Paltrow’s sister – someone who has nothing in common with her sibling and is more organized and focused. And Anthony Hopkins is good as usual, which is one expects of him. Jake Gyllenhaal seems to be settling in Hollywood now. He had an average role in this movie but his bigger roles in Brokeback Mountain and Jarhead await. Ofcourse, Donnie Darko was still one of his best roles.

Like A History of Violence, I don’t believe this movie should have been shown in multiplexes. Yes I know the big theatres are trying to diversify but really a movie like Proof is not the way to do it.

Trio of Movies: Head-On, Hop, Inch'Allah Dimanche

1) Head-On (2004 movie written and directed by Fatih Akin): Rating 9.5/10

A drunk German/Turkish man slams his car into a wall. The experts believe he wanted to kill himself. So he is sent to an institution. There he meets a Turkish woman. The Turkish woman is there because she had attempted to kill herself as well. Seeing the newly admitted man is Turkish as well, she proposes marriage. Why? Because she needs to escape from her parents clutches. And her traditional parents won’t agree unless the groom is Turkish. But it won’t be a real marriage. They would fake it and live like room-mates. The man does not agree. But after a horrific attempt to kill herself, the man gives in and agrees to marry the woman. Their marriage is unusual and so is the honeymoon. The woman having been liberated goes around enjoying her new freedom – clubbing, drinking and screwing as many men as she can. After her repeated late night outs, her room-mate husband eventually gets jealous -- he is falling in love with her. But things take a turn for the worse and the man finds lands up in jail. The woman leaves Germany to return to Istanbul where her life takes yet another turn. Finally the man turns up in Turkey to seek out the love of this life. What happens next?

An interesting and well made movie! Both actors are very good. But the star of the movie has to be Sibel Kekilli who plays her role superbly – you can see her character transform through various stages in the movie.

2) Hop (2002 movie directed by Dominique Standaert): Rating 9/10

Who knew watching a soccer game could be worth so much trouble? Well it becomes even more difficult if you have to steal cable from your neighbour to watch the game! Justin and his father sit down to enjoy Belgium’s Euro 200 run. But Justin has stolen the signal from his neighbour’s cable and as a result, his neighbour’s game reception is very poor. So when the neighbour finds out that his cable signal is being hijacked, he is not happy. Needless to say, Justin and his dad don’t finish watching the game -- they are too busy running for their lives. As a result, they get separated. Justin’s dad is arrested and faces deportation. So Justin has to come up with a way to get his father back. Lucky for Justin, he lands up at the door of a revolutionary.

This is a charming light hearted movie which manages to tackle the serious issues in an easy going manner. Yes the script is a bit contrived but I really liked this sincere effort.

3) Inch'Allah Dimanche (written and directed by Yamina Benguigui): Rating 10/10

Perfection! That is the best word to describe this amazing movie which tackles the issue of immigration. In 1974 the French Government allowed the country’s Algerian workforce to bring their families to France. That resulted into a lot of Algerian women and children leaving their homeland to head to a different world. Adjusting to a new culture and country is never easy. And the task is made even more difficult when you have someone trying to shove old values down your throat. That is the problem that Zouina (played beautifully by Fejria Deliba) faces when she has to live with her husband and her traditional Algerian mother-in-law in France. The husband was living alone in France and does not seem to change his thinking or way of life after his mother, wife and children arrive in the country. In fact, he is too busy working to be bothered by household issues. In the meantime, the mother-in-law is trying to suffocate the wife with Algerian values without paying heed to the French surroundings. I know this may sound clichéd, but it is done so well. Unlike poor stereo-typed American-Indian movies which attacked the traditional parents, this movie strives to realistically show things as they are.

A History of Violence

A History of Violence (directed by David Cronenberg): Rating 8/10

Hmm, a difficult movie to judge! I had huge expectations of this movie, which is a reason I think I felt a wee bit letdown. Anyway, onto the story... For the sake of not giving away a lot, the movie can be broken down into a couple of levels: a western on one hand, and a mob movie on the other.

Western: A man with no name comes to a small town. He starts a family and lives a peaceful life. One day two bad men come to his café and threaten the staff. The Man with no name leaps to the rescue and shoots the two bad men. He becomes a town hero. But then one day, three men in black suits come visit him. One of them who has a scarred eye and face seems to insist on knowing the town hero. He claims that the Man with no name has a name after all. Hmm. Could it be true? Is there something more to this than meets the eye?

Mob Movie: So can the Man with no name be who the mob people say he is? The mob element conveniently forms the second half of the movie.

And on top of these visible levels is another level – survival. Yes the very question of survival of the fittest. This is what the movie is about in the end. Whoever has the power will prevail. And whoever has the gun will win. A Canadian director has directed a very American movie indeed. Yes in some cases, violence is the only means to a solution. But what if there was no mob element in the movie? How would things have turned up? We won’t know the answer to that because the movie is based on a graphic novel, meaning it was already tied to the story. For me I would have loved to see a darker movie and not something which was reduced to clichés because of the mob. And I thought William Hurt (he makes an appearance near the end) was terrible. I don’t think there should have been humor in this movie but there is. Maybe it was a way to sell the movie to multiplexes. But Mystic River has also played in these same theatres, so has 21 Grams. One of my problems with Dogville was the mob element in that movie. But the fact is that Dogville and History of Violence are in the end dictated by the mob elements – things turn up the way they do because of the mob. But I wish these movies had taken a different route. Things turn up the way they do because of people’s action. Using the mob simply lends an easy avenue to explain everything, it makes everything more acceptable. And at the end of the day, having a gun only blurs the line between thought and action. The movie goes back to the question that was asked in Bowling for Columbine regarding gun violence – are people safe because they have guns? Because no matter what, the bad guys will always have guns. So the good guys must have guns too.

Yes everyone should apparently have guns. We can then go around solving all problems like in the days of the Wild West. Yup. A History of Violence, Indeed!!!!

2005 CIFF Wrap Up

Compared to last year’s festival, I only saw 14 movies this year. However, I skipped 3 complete days (either through choice or other commitments) so essentially I only saw the 14 movies over 7 days, which means an average of 2 movies per day. And last year, I saw 18 movies over 9 days (skipping only one day), so once again, an average of 2 movies per day.

Well in between the festival, I took time out for 2 offbeat movies which I include below. The 2 movies were part of a proposed SIFF, Sachin International Film Festival :)

Well on with the list:

1) Day 1, Friday, Sept 23:

The much awaited Water made its debut at a packed gala presentation but I opted for the less packed Amu. Shonali Bose wrote and directed this flick about the 1984 killing of Sikhs in Delhi following Indra Gandhi’s assassination. The story revolves around Kaju (played perfectly by Konkana Sen Sharma) visiting Delhi after a long stay in America. She is fascinated by India and wants to get in touch with her roots. But slowly, she uncovers more about her past than she had imagined. A well made movie which I quite liked.


Movie Rating: 9/10

2) Day 2, Sat, Sept 24: 4 movies on tap

a) Il Conformista (restored 1970 print of Bernardo Bertolucci)

Based on Alberto Moravia’s novel, The Conformist is a movie about sex, politics and more politics. More importantly, delighted to have seen a 35 mm print of this film.

b) Turtles Can Fly (2004 Kurdish movie by Bahman Ghobadi): Rating 9/10

A joint production between Iraq and Iran, this movie is another example of the disappearing line documentary and fiction. Movies like this feel so real that well that you can’t believe it is indeed fiction. The movie is set on the Iraqi-Turkish border on the eve of American’s invasion of Iraq. What happens when people are forced to leave their homes? What drama occurs when people are made to wait like refugees on the border? One reason why the movie leaves such a lasting impression is because it is shown from the point of view of children. Children who are forced to work as mines gatherers; they are paid on how many mines they can find. Children who are forced to bear the scars of wars committed by men who can’t comprehend humanity! Anyway, this was a movie I watched without reading anything about it before hand. That is the best way to watch this powerful movie.

c) L’ Enfant (The Child directed by Jean-Pierre Dardenne and Luc Dardenne): Rating 10 / 10

This Cannes winner is vintage cinema verite. We watch the lives of Bruno and Sofia as they try to make ends meet while supporting their newborn child. Bruno is a con artist who spends money as fast as he gathers it. So saving money for their newborn child is an alien concept to him. But he makes mistakes, learns from them and the camera is there capturing every moment, watching him.

d) Cellar (written and directed by Ben Hickernell)

Two men wake up in a cellar. They realize they are former friends who have not kept in touch for a long time. The only other relevant items in the cellar are canned foods and a gun with a single bullet. Why are they there? It sounds like Saw, but it isn’t. The movie's pace is slower than Saw and slackens midway through the film. Still, a decent first time effort.

3) Day 3, Sunday, Sept 25:

Skipped the festival for various reasons. Instead watching two movies from my personal collection of movies gathered from overseas.

a) Le Festin De La Mante (The Praying Mantis directed by Marc Levie): Rating 8/10

A simple erotic movie with no bloated story line or un-necessary dialogues! In fact, the images speak for themselves. Considering I had never heard of this little movie from Belgium, watching it was quite a surprise indeed. Sylvia (Lou Broclain) is a woman who is possessed by an evil force. When the evil force takes over she needs to find a prey to satisfy her inner demons.

b) Imagining Argentina (2003 movie directed by Christopher Hampton):

A good movie about the ‘disapperance’ of people during Argentina’s dictatorship during the 1970’s and 80’s. The movie stars Antonio Banderas and Emma Thompson. One day Banderas comes home and his wife is not there. She was taken away. But as it turns out that Banderas has a gift to actually see people’s past and even the future. He is able to touch a person’s belonging and find out what happened to them. This way he helps other people learn the truth about their loved ones and even manages to find some clues to help locate his wife. For a movie that I had not heard of, this was decent.

4) Day 4, Monday, Sept 26: Back to the festival

a) Sidekick (directed by Blake Van de Graaf, written and funded by Michael Sparaga): Rating 7.5/10

A true Canadian independent movie! The film-makers were all there and were happy to see a well received reception of their movie’s World Premier. Made on a shoe-string budget, Sidekick is a charming story about a modern day super hero. Norman (Perry Mucci) lives an ordinary life. He is not taken seriously at work, and is laughed at. In his spare time, he lives in a comic book world. By chance, he notices a co-worker (Victor played by David Ingram) seems to possess extraordinary powers. So secretly he goes about spying on Victor and confirms his hunch. He wants to train Victor to fully realize his super powers and offers to become his sidekick. But little does he realize that Victor might not be the kind of super hero that wants to be trained. By independent Canadian movie standards, this is a very good effort which once again highlights the motto that “with great power comes great responsibility”.

b) Rhinoceros Eyes (Directed by Aaron Woodley): Rating 9/10

David Cronenberg’s nephew makes an impressive debut with this excellent effort. I noticed shades of Donnie Darko in this visually rich flick. Chep (Michael Pitt) works in a prop house. He works by himself in the back of the shop has no friends. His favourite pastime is to watch old Hollywood movies. The owner of the prop house and his friends are a class act (hilariously acted by all). When one day, a movie designer, Fran (Paige Turco) turns up looking for rare props, Chep falls in love. He will do anything to get the rare props she requires. Gradually his sense of reality disappears and the dark forces around him start to descend upon Chep.

Easily one of the best movies I have seen this year!

5) Day 5, Tuesday, Sept 27: Surprize.

After a lot of debating, I headed out to see The Syrian Bride and C.R.A.Z.Y. But due to print transport problems, The Syrian Bride didn’t make it to the country in time and was eventually rescheduled for Thursday at 4:15 pm. Instead I was treated to my second surprise of the festival.

a) Yes (directed by Sally Porter): Rating 9/10

I had wanted to see this movie but it was conflicting with other choices on Friday. Now I got to see this movie. And what a movie it is! The entire dialogue is in iambic pentameter, meaning it rhymes. At first, it seems a bit strange but once you get used to it, it flows easily. In the first frames we are introduced to the Cleaner (Shirley Henderson) who tells us about dirt particles and no matter how much we try, we can never be free of dirt. Then the movie dives into the lives of She (Joan Allen) and Anthony (Sam Neill) whose marriage is in trouble and they are only keeping up pretences. So Allen welcomes an affair with the charming seductive Lebanese man (Simon Abkarian). And the rest of the movie debates on the important questions – methaphysics, terrorism, love, racism, life and everything in between. All the while rhyming everything. Either one hates this movie or loves it. I for one, loved it!!!

b) C.R.A.Z.Y (directed by Jean-Marc Vallee): Rating 7/10

Winner of best Canadian feature at TIFF! A sold out show at CIFF and the audience loved it. However, I was disappointed. Yes this coming of age Quebec movie is good but it is nothing special. The movie charts the life of the Beaulieu family through three decades of changing time, different music and varied values. The title stands for the first letter of each of the 5 sons.

6) Day 6, Wednesday, Sept 28:

Another skipped day.

7) Day 7, Thursday, Sept 29:

a) Alles Auf Zucker! (Go for Zucker! Directed by Dani Levy): Rating 8/10

This movie beat out Downfall at the German movie awards in 2005. This is a well made light hearted movie about a class of German and Jewish cultures. A German man is forced to revisit his Jewish way of life in order to get a slice of his mother’s inheritance. Another condition of the will is that he has to make up with his brother, who lives a very traditional Jewish life. Funny overall.

b) Amarelo Manga (Mango Yellow, 2002 movie directed by Claudio Assis): Rating 7.5/10

A day in the life of Recife! I was introduced to this colourful Brazilian port city via Peter Robbs book, Death in Brazil. Even though this movie has nothing to do with the book, it presents an interesting set of characters. The movie starts and ends with the owner of Avenida Bar. Considering this is a first time effort shot on a budget of $250,000 dollars, it is a very commendable effort. We meet different people in this city and how messed up everything is in their life. After the half-way point, the movie loses its steam and gets plain boring. Nonetheless, a worthy effort.

8) Day 8, Friday, Sept 30:

a) Cache (Hidden directed by Michael Haneke): Rating 9.5/10

How does one describe this interesting movie? A simple movie on one level but manages to hide a lot underneath. One day a regular couple Anne and Georges (Juliette Binoche and Daniel Auteuil) receive a 2 hour tape showing their house happenings. Who made this tape? Why did this person mail them the tape? Whatever the reason, this is something which unnerves the couple. And then again, they get another tape showing them leaving the house. The second tape comes with a childish drawing of a boy coughing up blood. They are afraid, but decide not to tell their teenage son. The police can’t do anything. And then the tapes become even more interesting.

On one level this movie is a thriller. On another level, the movie is about the class levels (or even race) that exist in France today. And then there is my favourite third level – this movie is an existential movie about a person’s guilt and memories. What tape? Is there a tape?

b) The Warrior (2001 movie directed by Asif Kapadia): Rating 7/10

The movie is visually gorgeous, with the desert and snow caps highlighting the moods of the warrior. Irfan Khan’s expressions are perfect; they had to be as there is not much dialogue.

9) Day 9, Saturday, Oct 1:

Another missed day.

10) Day 10, Sunday, Oct 2:

Grizzly Man was sold out and the line up for Horloge Biologique was a bit long. So instead I opted for the movie with no lineup – Protocols of Zion. This Marc Levin directed documentary tackles the myth surrounding Jews and that day in September, 2001. A very well made movie which shows the lengths and trouble people will go in their blind hatred of others. Another surprise of the festival!

Rating 8/10

The Three Colours and Lord of War

Finally after thinking about it for years, I have managed to watch all three colour movies of Krzysztof Kieslowski: Bleu, Blanc and Rouge.

1) Bleu (1993 movie starring Juliette Binoche):

Binoche plays Julie Vignon, a woman who loses her husband and young daughter in a car accident. After surviving the accident, Binoche wants to distance herself from her past life and that of her husband’s profession, who was a famous musical composer. No matter how hard she tries, she finds herself getting drawn back to her husband’s music. Eventually, she learns that true ‘liberty’ can be found by not running away from her past but by embracing it.

Technically, this is a good movie. The soundtrack and the visuals are very good. The blue colour is present everywhere, and is used very effectively to portray Julie’s husband’s soul (atleast I thought so). However, despite the good acting, I didn’t enjoy this movie too much. The weakest of all three colour movies for me.

2) Blanc (1994 movie starring Zbigniew Zamachowski and Julie Delpy):

Delpy wants to divorce her Polish husband because he can’t perform in bed. So coldly she throws him out of the house, cancels his bank cards and sticks the cops on him. The penniless and passportless husband, Karol Karol, smuggles himself back into Poland to return to his old life. But quickly, he gets the idea to become rich through a series of street smart transactions and manages to use his wealth to take revenge on his ex-wife.

This is the most light hearted of the three movies and probably the most accessible. Needless to say, I liked this one the best.

PS: If you blink, you might miss Binoche making a quick appearance in the court room.

3) Rouge (1995 movie starring Irène Jacob):

The trilogy is concluded with Rouge and the major actors from the previous two movies make an appearance in this one as well. A Swiss model runs over a dog and when she goes to return the dog to the owner, she discovers the owner’s strange hobby – spying on his neighbours. The owner is a retired judge who has nothing else to do in his life. Initially, Valentine is critical of the judge but the more she gets to know him, the more she understands him.

This is a pretty interesting movie which beautifully layers three different stories together. Despite the complexity of the story and the beautiful visuals, I didn’t enjoy this one that much. Probably because since 1994, I have seen a lot of good French movies which have handled relationships in a better manner.

Anyway, I have to tackle Kieslowski’s Decalouge sometime in the future.

4) Lord of War (written and directed by Andrew Niccol): Rating – anywhere from 6 to an 8

Just before the final credits roll, we are told this ‘movie is based on actual events’. Also, the interesting observation is made that the 5 biggest arm supplying nations in the world are also the 5 permanent members of the U.N. That being said, the movie is not a global political movie but instead it is about the life of an arms dealer, Yuri Orlov (Nicolas Cage). The movie follows a similar pattern to other dealer movies, like Blow (drug dealing) – talk/about the first stages of the dealer’s life, show how the dealer got started, highlight some of his big transactions, throw in a love story with kids, a moral question, attempt to go clean and finally temptation to return back into the business for one final score. But despite all the formulas, I liked Lord of War a lot. One big reason is the voice-over narrative technique used. Yuri addresses the camera at the start and end of the movie. In between, he narrates aspects of his life, gives his views on gun/political issues and talks about his mistakes or shortcomings. But unlike High Fidelity, he does not address the camera directly. Instead, using voice over narratives, he informs us on the scene being shown and the political context. And Yuri makes it clear that at no point are we supposed to like him. He is just there to conduct business.

Another strong point of the movie is the few gutsy sequences used to show the evils of bullets (the opening credit sequence hits the point home). Instead of drilling us with sermons on the evils of guns, the movie lets us observe how guns effect life in third world countries. Also, there has been some good research done regarding the gun trade. For example, the gun trade dealings following the fall of the Soviet Union are accurate.

One of the negatives is that the movie predictably places Yuri in a lot of the typical hot spots of the 80’s and 90’s (Beirut, Ukraine, Colombia, Africa). Sure these were the places that were in most need of weapons at that point in time, but besides Africa, we are only given snippets of the other countries. One minor complain is that I wish the movie spent more time showing the political details instead of spending time on his life. Would the movie have been better if his wife/child subplot had not been included? Possibly!

Nonetheless, Niccol is a creative writer who stays a bit ahead of the times – in 1997 he wrote and directed Gattaca, a mix of 1984 and Brave New World; in 1998 he wrote The Truman Show, a movie made before the North American craze of Reality shows started; 2002 he wrote and directed S1m0ne, an interesting movie about a computer generated movie actress. On first instinct, I loved this movie and considered it one of the year’s best along with The Constant Gardener, Sin City and Batman Begins. But the more I thought about it, the more loop holes and problems I found with the story. So while I can’t give this movie a very high rating, I like its attempt. Despite not using any American dollars for the production, this is still a multiplex movie. It may not be a typical commercial movie but it still contains those contrived elements. Overall, a valiant effort like 2001’s Spy Game.

European, Asian and North American flicks

1) A Very Long Engagement (directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet) : Rating 9/10

Three years after Amélie, Jeunet is back with another movie and once again, Audrey Tautou is the charming lead. This beautifully shot movie tells Mathilde’s search for her fiancée who disappeared with 4 other prisoners in the trenches of WW1. Even though the setting is different, the movie oozes with the charm and wit of Amélie. This means that there are smart subplots and corny characters that are just a pleasure to watch. I am not sure if all these subplots were part of the original novel by Sébastien Japrisot or were added by the mind of Jeuent and his screenwriter Guillaume Laurant? The final result is a visual and narrative delight. Although I have to admit I felt the movie dragged on a bit near the end, but it is worth watching.

2) The Stranger (written and directed by Satyajit Ray): Rating 10/10

Vintage! Absolutely brilliant! That is how much I loved this movie. The last movie from Satyajit Ray is one of the best out there. One day a wife receives a letter that her long lost uncle is planning to pay a visit to her in Calcutta. She has not seen the uncle in 35 years and he was presumed to be missing. The husband is immediately suspicious of the uncle’s motives and asks his wife to be cautious. However, the extremely well traveled and intelligent uncle has stories to tell about his mysterious life. Utpal Dutt is brilliant as the long lost uncle and I have to admit, this is the first non-Hindi movie I have seen of his. One of the best movies I have ever seen! Wanderlust!!

3) The Goalie's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick (1972 movie directed by Wim Winders): Rating 7/10

The title is not properly translated in English. The goalie is not anxious or fearful of the penalty kick in this movie. In fact, he is indifferent. The movie starts and ends on a soccer field. At the start of the movie, a goalie is not in his net when the other team scores from a penalty kick. He does not seem worried or concerned. After the game, he wanders the streets of Vienna aimlessly. He picks up a movie theatre cashier. After spending the night with her, he causally proceeds to strangle her. But he is not in a hurry to get away. In fact, he heads to a small town and calmly reads the daily newspapers where he learns of the police’s investigation of the theatre girl’s murder. The police may be closing in on him but he spends time watching a local soccer game. And this is where the movie ends! I am hoping reading Peter Handke’s original novel might give me a better understanding of the story.

4) Chaos (original title Kaosu, 1999 movie directed by Hideo Nakata): Rating 6.5/10

In Between the two Ringu movies, Nakata directed this mystery thriller. A husband and wife have dinner at an expensive restaurant. When the husband is busy paying the bill, the wife walks out and disappears. The husband believes she has gone home but later that day, he receives a call from a man claiming to have kidnapped his wife. A few scenes later, we learn that the wife staged her own kidnapping to get money from her husband. And a few scenes later, as the story unfolds, we learn something else completely. Twists, turns and more twists. By the end, I just didn’t care anymore. And yes unlike Nakata’s other movies, this is not a scary movie. Just a slow paced thriller which takes its time to get to the truth.

5) When Will I Be Loved (written and directed by James Toback): Rating 8/10

Interesting! A movie that got slammed by critics turned out to be that bad. Neve Campbell plays Vera, a woman who lives an easy going life in New York. The movie starts off with her talking a shower and eventually jerking off with the shower handle. The next scenes are spliced equally of Vera and Ford (Fred Weller) who in their own ways are going about their day differently. Vera has a fling with a woman, has an interview for a university assistant position, while Ford has a foursome in Central Park and is trying to come up with a string of new projects to make money. This is the first stage of the movie. The second stage features Ford trying to convince his girlfriend Vera to sleep with a Count for money. Shades of Indecent Proposal. Vera agrees and goes onto have an interesting dialogue with the Count about money and relationships. She sleeps with him and in turn gets one million dollars. But she tells Ford that she didn’t get any money. Ford faces up with the Count, and through a strange Noirish twist, the movie ends. That would be the third stage. The movie clocks in under 80 minutes and there really is no un-necessary baggage in this flick. The dialogues are interesting enough and the last scene in the movie clearly conveys Vera’s attention.

So what do I really think of this movie? One thing is clear. Vera is not as dumb as we might think. Her angle is to constantly act in certain ways to understand the true nature of men. She clearly does not think much of men and is more happy in her dealings with women. Ford is clearly a hussler who would do anything to become rich.

6) Wicker Park (directed by Paul McGuigan): Rating 6/10

I have not seen the original French movie L’Appartement this movie is based on, but I can be sure that version would be far more interesting considering it starred Vincent Cassel and Monica Belluci. The biggest problem I had with Wicker Park was the pacing. It was too slow for the complexity of the story it wanted to convey. Before leaving overseas for a business trip, a man is in a restaurant meeting his clients and to-be-wife. He believes he sees a woman from his past. So he misses his overseas flight and tries to find this woman. Why did this woman (whom he loved tremendously) mysteriously disappear two years ago? Slowly the movie reveals the truth. Unfortunately the movie trailers give away this information, so I sort of knew what to expect. But since this movie is not a thriller like Single White Female (I was reminded of this movie in a few scenes of Wicker Park), it takes its time in arriving at the conclusion. The problem is I could not care when everything was said and done.

7) High Art (1998 movie written and directed by Lisa Cholodenko): Rating 7/10

Syd (Radha Mitchell), an assistant editor in a photography mag, has a problem with water leaking from the apartment above hers. So she decides to have a talk with her neighbour, Lucy (Ally Sheedy) about fixing the leak. It turns out that Lucy is a famous photographer who stopped working 10 years ago. Syd is enchanted by Lucy’s work and wants to help Lucy get work again. So she sets up a meeting with her bosses and Lucy. With time, Syd falls in love with Lucy and is drawn into Lucy’s lifestyle.

The story is not as simple as I just mentioned above. I neglected to mention Lucy’s circle of drug addict friends and her relationship with Greta, a German actresses who used to act in Fassbinder movies. The movie has an art house feel to it.

The Gardener, books and a missed chance

When you have a chance to fulfill a dream but you can't because you have other obligations, then how do you feel? Gutted in my case. I have just given up my Arsenal tickets because of other things. I was so close to getting a chance to see my fav. team play in their final year in the legendary Highbury stadium. Heck, even a beautiful flick like the Constant Gardener can't make up for that loss. No good book will help either.

Anyway.

The Constant Gardener (directed by Fernando Meirelles): Rating 9/10

A beautiful movie yet I can't consider it perfect. I have not read the original book by John Le Carre but this story feels more like a Graham Greene story. No other director could have taken Kenya and incorporated such a beautiful visual feel to it. Ofcourse Meirelles has his DOP from City of God, Cesar Charlone, to help him. And it shows. There are some scenes which look straight out of City of God (and in fact have no place in this movie, but that is a minor complain). And what is the story? A Love story wrapped around a political unveiling of the evils that western drug companies perform in Africa! A british diplomat working for the High Commision is in Kenya with his wife. The wife is an activist who wants to expose the evil of the drug companies there. The husband wants to stay away from all this mess and simply wants to look after his garden. To each his own. And when a tragedy results, the husband is forced to look at the ugly truth. He undergoes a change and understands what his wife wanted.

Acting wise, Ralph Fiennes does a good job as usual but Rachel Weisz is amazing. Her best role yet? Probably! Some of the other supporting roles have done a good job as well. Directing wise, I don't agree with all of Meirelles shot selections. His locale shots are perfect but his use of close-ups with handheld camera is what I had problems with. In some scenes, the close up didn't add anything. And the jerky handheld feel didn't give any more taste of reality to the movie either. In one scene, he drips the scene in too much dramatic background score for no reason. The chefs are busy cooking in the kitchen. Cue loud fast drums. The waiter takes a try of wine glasses out. End fast music. What was the point of that sudden loud scene in the movie? Nothing. Reminded me of City of God's opening scene. There are scenes of trains arriving with drum music which work in the movie but not that restaurant scene. Am I being too picky with a movie I really liked? Yes.

This is one of my favourite movies of the year yet I can't give it a 10!

---------------------------------------------

Some books on last month's reading list:

1) Collected Prose: essays, autobiographical writings, true stories by Paul Auster.
In the last few months Auster has emerged as one of my favourite writers. He is guy who writes with talent and does not feel like a hack looking to make a quick book. His Book of Illusions, New York Trilogy were wonderful. So it was fun to read some of his essays about he got into writing, his struggles and just some true stories that he gathered.

2) Simon Winchester's Calcutta: Why is the title Simon Winchester's Calcutta?
Simon and his son have written 2 essays about what they feel about the complex city that is Calcutta. Other than that, the book contains essays and writings about the city from a collection of well knows writers (Tagore is there, ofcourse). I didn't finish all the collected writings but the father and son have a good job of outlining this city's interesting history.

3) Supercargo: A journey among ports
Thorton McCamish writes about his interesting trip around the world's mystic port cities. Read most of it and it is a good read. Another lonely planet publication like the Calcutta book above.

4) Companero: The life and death of Che Guevera
by Jorge G. Castaneda

A very well researched book about the myth that is Che. Not even close to finishing it, but I found myself spending time reading the chapters that are the most contradicting episodes in his life. Che's youth is well documented but his time in Congo and Bolivia are the shadowy sections.

5) Rio De Janeiro: Carnival under Fire
by Ruy Castro

Ah Rio! So much to talk about. Unfortunately, I ran out of time dealing with this one. Maybe some other month?

September -- Festival Time

Well the festival time has started and the fall movie line-up is on the verge of being ushered out. Venice
kicked things off this past weekend with a distinct Asian movie line-up. Up next are TIFF, CIFF, Edmonton and VIFF. So in order to prepare for the festivals, I need to finish some commercial viewings before that.

1) Paycheck (2003 movie directed by John Woo): Rating 7/10

I had never seen this movie earlier because I was warned off it by a number of people. It turns out not to be that bad of a movie as I was led to believe. Sure it is a pointless action movie but atleast it has a good idea. Since it is based on another Philip K.Dick story, the movie was sure to have an interesting story line. But as with other sci-fi movies, Hollywood just runs them into the ground. This year, The Island was another example of a good sci-fi idea gone bad. In Paycheck, Ben Affleck plays a reverse engineer who works for different companies and at the end of each contract, has his memory turfed to protect his employer's intellectual property. And then sure enough, something goes wrong. Or it appears to. Our hero has to work backwards with a handful of clues to determine what really happenned in his 3 year long contract?
The puzzle like nature of the clues are interesting enough but the movie has quite a number of boring action scenes which don't add anything to the movie and end up slowing the movie down.

None the less, a neat germ of an idea hidden here. If a country pre-emptively attacks another country thinking that country will one day attack them, then the attacking country in turn creates a situation where the defending country is forced to attack back. In reality, if things were left as is, then the defending country would never have attacked. Hmmm...

2) Sehar (2005 Bollywood movie directed by Kabeer Kaushik): Rating 9/10

An honest cop taking on the local ganster is a favorite topic in Bolly movies. But if it is done well, like in Sehar's case, then the movie watching is an enriching experience. As it turns out like in the case of movies such as Hasil, Kurushetra, Shool, the directors do have a story to tell. And they tell it well. Backed by a well written script and amazing acting, Sehar is easily one of the best Indian movies of 2005. Arshad Warsi is perfect in his role as is Pankaj Kupar. The only weakpoint might be Sushant Singh as the young gang leader who wants to run things his own way. The movie shows the difficulty the police have in tracking down the illegal activities and highlights how the Lucknow branches had to be trained on how to deal with emerging technologies such as cellphones to deal with organized crime. The movie is set in 1998, at a time when cell phones were just hitting the Lucknow scene.

3) Dus (misdirected by Anubhav Sinha): Rating 6/10

As usual Anubhav Sinha has his weak directing skills stamped over an otherwise enjoyable movie. The poor script can't make up for the flashy setup up though. An international terrorist is hiding in Canada. And the Anti-terrorist branch of India has to track this man down and find out what big event is being planned for May 10. They had intercepted of a big plan to take place on the 10th from Algiers (in reality, Calgary is being passed off as Algiers, stupidity #1). Fair enough. But what takes place after that seems contrived and well just poorly scripted. None the less, I didn't mind all the fluff as much as I thought I would. The ending sequence is so poorly done that words can't describe. A crowd in a Calgary stadium is spliced with an European scene spliced with England's soccer game spliced with a fake computer generated background and on and on...Argh. The fact that I sat through the movie without wanting to fast forward it is a sign that it was better than average.

4) The Cooler (2003 movie directed by Wayne Kramer): Rating 7.5/10

Las Vegas movies neatly fall into various groups -- gangster and or/robberies, drunk + drug overdose or maybe quick fling + marriage. The Cooler does take a different approach by combining a Leaving Las Vegas story with a cultural generation gap theme. The end result feels that it is trying to hard to win the critics over. That was my gut instinct, movies like this are trying to hard to over-dramatize situations. Anyway, the love story between two opposites involves a 'cooler', Bernie, (William H.Macy) and a run-away-from-home-waitress, Natalie (Maria Bello). A 'cooler' is someone with a negative presence (it can be his touch or mere appearance) that he turns people's winning streakes into losing ones. Or so goes the superstition. Shelley (Alec Baldwin) believes in such techniques and forces his cooler to stick around. But when the cooler falls in love with Natalie and his luck changes, well, then Shelley has a problem. He bullies Natalie into leaving Bernie. At the same time, Shelley has to deal with keeping his casino running according to the pure old ways. He is being forced to go with the times and make the casino more family friendly for package tours. The acting is good all over, which is to be expected with the three main actors. But somehow I was not too overly in love with this movie partly because of all the Las Vegas run down themes being flashed around -- hollowness, depression, the town's greed aura, etc.

5) Cube 2: Hypercube (2002 directed by Andrzej Sekula): Rating 8/10

1997's Cube was an amazingly well directed and written movie by Canadian Vincenzo Natali. The movie had such a cult following that well, a sequel was deemed necessary. But the director from the original movie was not involved, so this was a first sign that somethign was wrong. Now ofcourse, a third Cube movie has been released. Will it stop here? I hope so. Anyway time to tackle Cube 2:

Despite all my preconceived notions, Cube 2 is not just a dumb sequel. It is a well thought-out script which stands on its own from the first movie. The director, Sekula, is also the DOP for the movie and that in this case turns out to be a good thing. He is responsible for some of the innovative camera shots, and the entire computer effects time has done a stellar job. I did notice a glitch in the sets near the end of the movie which kinda dampned things. You notice a person walking on the other side of the cube which breaks from the tension of the situation.
Just like the first movie, different people wake up in different rooms in a cube. They have no idea why they are there. So they try to find the pattern among all the cubes and try to escape. Unlike the first one, the performances in this movie are not that great. It could have to do with the fact that the actors were working against a green screen for a lot of the shots.

And for a change, there is a proper resolution in this one. In the ending we do get to set what the cube is all about and who created it. 60659!

End of the month -- Asian Flair

The line between documentaries and fiction is blurred sometimes and no more so than in the first two movies.

1) In This World (2002 movie directed by Michael Winterbottom): Rating 8/10

It starts off like a documentary, then switches to fiction mode and when it ends, you realize the story was based on true events. And the amazing cinematography, with appropriate close-ups makes you feel like you are a traveler in the film. The story is simple enough: a street smart boy agrees to lead another fellow Afghan refugee from Peshawar to London. Along the way, they cross into Iran (with some difficulty) and from there have to make it into Turkey, then catch the boat to Italy and then to London. But the journey is difficult and comes with its share of problems. Not much dialogue and that is appropriate, the visual images speak for themselves. Sometimes the editing feels off but I didn’t care – I was completely absorbed in this movie. A very good effort.

2) Mountain Patrol (original title, Kekexili, directed by Chuan Lu): Rating 9.5/10

WOW! Another movie based on a true story – the film shows the efforts of the Tibetan mountain patrol setup to prevent poaching of the endangered Tibetan Antelope. The poachers love hunting this animal because of the expensive price that the fur fetches. But the Tibetans want to protect the animal before it becomes extinct. The movie is from the point of view of a Chinese journalist who tags along with the patrol in search of the poachers. Visually this movie is beautiful. And the screenplay is very good as well. Once again, I was caught up in the movie. The patrol’s life is not easy and this movie captures the hardships in the lonely desolate stretch of land.

3) Les Fils Du Vent (Son of the Wind, directed by Julien Seri): Rating 4/10

I had such high hopes of this movie but was let down quite a bit. The movie starts off in Bangkok with an attempted high storey robbery. The two robbers don’t finish the job because the girl (with her brother being the other robber) changes her mind. But that missed chance puts them in trouble with the Yakuza. The scene switches to London with a game of high speed building jumping and chasing the ball (sorry I don’t know if there is a name for this game). The stunts are amazing, with the muscular athletes leaping off buildings with ease. They next travel to Bangkok where they help run a local gym. However, they run into problems with the local gang and indirectly with the Yakuza. Not much for plot but a lot of jumping up and down metal beams and some neat kicks. However, watching someone jumping up and down gets tiring after say 20 minutes or so. Especially if the jerky camera work gives you a headache. And the dragged out fight sequence in the end is pointless and has no place in the story. A missed chance to make a great movie here.

Mid August shows

1) Bad Guy (2001 movie directed by Ki-duk Kim): Rating 8/10

A man sees a college girl sitting on a bench. He is infatuated with her. So he sits up close to her on the bench. She is uncomfortable and promptly gets up when her boyfriend approaches. But the guy steps up to the girl and forcibly kisses her. The boyfriend gets made and gets into a fight. The guy gets beat up the gathering police as well. He wants revenge. So by some carefully arranged events, the girl ends up in a prostitution house. Initially, the guy just watches her, does not touch her. When the girl finds out, she is upset as expected. But for some reason, a bond develops between the two.

It is an interesting movie which is nothing like the shocking posters of a nude girl on the cover. In fact, there is very little nudity in the movie. It is a slow paced movie which grows on you. Like his previous movie, the Isle, the movie shows a love relationship tainted by pain and torture.

2) Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (directed by Rainer Werner Fassbinder): Rating 9/10

The cold stare. That wicked cold stare which judges, which humiliates.
On a rainy day, an older German woman walks into a bar. The bar is playing Arabic music. And the mostly Arab occupants of the bar stare back at the woman. Ali goes up the woman and asks her for a dance. During the course of their conversation, they strike up a friendship. And Ali ends up sleeping with the woman. Their age gap and race division becomes the hot topic for the woman’s family, co-workers and social circle. She is isolated, stared at and humiliated. This is Germany in the 70’s when racial discrimination was very common. And Fassbinder has crafted a powerful yet simple movie. Punctuated by the long cold state! And the camera angles are just perfect.

3) Coupling – Season 2, 3 and 4:
Well the British comedy Coupling only last four seasons. In reality, the first three seasons were stellar with the fourth one not being on the same wavelength. One of the reasons why the first three seasons were good was because of Jeff Murdoch (played brilliantly by Richard Coyle). After Richard left in the fourth season, things were not the same. That being sad, it is still an excellent show. A cross between Friends and Sex and the City but much better! Because the series shows both sides of male-female relationships as opposed to a single sided approach (like Sex and the City).

August Already

Well quite a few movies to discuss, including two charming love stories. But first off, I want to discuss two completely different movies, each with their fair share of problems.

1) Mangal Pandel – The Rising (mis-directed by Ketan Mehta): Rating 5.5/10

Aamir’s Khan first movie in almost 4 years is a huge waste of time! Why is this movie so bad? Well the lack of a screenplay reduces every frame to a misplaced scene. Then comes the absence of direction which results in extras and actors looking out of place. Then there is the poor acting (with the exception of Toby Stephens). The music is just so-so, the dances out of place. The cinematography is good but the editing is sub-standard. I don’t think any blame would lie with Sreekar Prasad (editor) if all the footage he got was just poor. Or should it?

A few example of the problems:

a) If one looks carefully, you can notice scenes in which the extras are looking either at the camera or are just moving their arms as if someone is shouting instructions at them.
b) The overly dramatic scenes. When Mangal rounds up every single villager and his troops to bring two flame torches each, do we expect that incident took a few seconds? Did the British simply stand around and wait to be surrounded by mashal holding Indians?
c) Lack of Continuity. Shots are just taken and put together. Each scene looks independent of the rest of the movie.
d) A battle is ranging on and Mangal has time to fight with his ex-friend Gordon?

I could go on....Calling this movie an epic and a great movie is an insult. Once again, Bollywood proves that despite having good production values, it can screw up. Amisha Patel and Rani Mukherji are un-needed wasteful characters who instead of adding something to the movie take something away. A hugely disappointing movie!!!

2) Downfall (Directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel): Rating 7.5/10

This movie showing the last hours of Adolf Hitler has gotten universal acclaim. So it should. But that does not mean it is a perfect movie! Bruno Ganz has delivered a stellar performance as Adolf Hitler. Every scene with him is a perfect scene. But without him, the movie just seems dull. The movie shows how cut off from reality Hitler was in his bunker. He had no idea how bad his troops were doing yet kept on talking about victories and the future. When he finally learns of impending failure (coupled with betrayals by his own loyal generals), he commits suicide along with his wife Eva Braun and orders their bodies to be burned. This happens at the 2 hour mark of the movie. But the movie does not end there. It goes on for another 26 minutes showing what happens to some of the other characters and how the Germans finally surrender.

The fact that the movie goes on after Hitler’s death is a good thing. It tries to show how things in reality panned out. But I just wish that we had gotten to that point sooner. The initial 2 hours should only have focused on the happenings in the bunker and not shown the outside. Those outside shots are weak and add nothing to the movie. Those same shots would have had more impact had they only being shown after Hitler’s death. Anyway, that is what I felt. Technically the movie is very good. But I had problems with how everything was laid out. The first half of the movie had no flow. It was scenes put together, some Hitler scenes, then outside, then back in the bunker, etc. Yet everything was tied together after his death.

-----------------------

Just a few words about the above two unrelated movies…Mangal Pandey ends after its main character dies. Yet I felt this was wrong. The movie should have focused on the impact his hanging had on rest of the nation for a while longer. The movie should have gotten to his hanging sooner. Downfall lingers on after Hitler’s death yet I felt it should have ended after his death.

Onto the two love stories…

3) Sepet (Directed by Yasmin Ahmad): Rating 9/10

A charming love story from Malaysia! In fact, one of the freshest and interesting love stories in a very long time. A Chinese boy meets a young Malay girl, and well infatuation takes place. The boy slips his phone number among the vcds he sold to the girl. And she gives him a call, the two of them go out and their friendship develops. But the boy is involved with a local gangster’s sister. And after he gets the gangster’s sister pregnant, he is in trouble. Forced to look after the pregnant girl, his relationship breaks off with the Malay girl. There is no happy ending to this movie but the sweetness with which how all the relationship scenes are handled is very touching! Especially the ones with the Malay girl and her parents. A great effort!

4) Socha Na Tha (written and directed by Imtiaz Ali): Rating 9/10

After 2001’s Dil Chahta Hai, Bollywood gets it right again! It took a while but this love story is as good as Sepet. A boy is forced to meet a girl for marriage. Both boy and girl discuss their future lie elsewhere. The boy rejects the girl. However, feud develops between boy and girl’s families over how the rejection was done. Boy and girl continue to be friends and their friendship soon turns to love. But both sets of families are now against their love. On top of that, Boy is involved with another girl and ends up dragging her family into the mix. Three sets of families are tormented because of one boy. WOW! That is the baggage that comes with the institution that is marriage. And this movie gets it right.

On to other assorted pics…..

3) Ken Park (directed by Larry Clark and Ed Lachman): Rating 2/10

Dressing up a soft porn movie as an American Beauty is not my idea of art. American Beauty had some merit to it but seriously, if you are going to take the story of confused and coming of age teens, then put some effort into the screenplay. Adding nudity and sex scenes is not the answer. But this seems to be the way Larry Clark makes his movies.

4) Sarkar (lack of direction by Ram Gopal Varma): Rating 4/10

Once upon a time Ram Gopal Varma knew how to make a good movie. Now, he has no clue. Nor do any of his productions. Sure he has managed to remove songs from his movies but along with that, he has eliminated the need for a story as well. Good acting by Amitabh Bachchan in an otherwise pointless movie. And calling this as a tribute to The Godfather is just a joke. What amazes me is the positive reviews that RGV productions (including this movie) keep getting. Have these people not watched Satya or Company?

5) The Island (was there a director?): Rating 5/10

Somewhere buried in this movie is a decent story. But unfortunately that story is never developed and instead it is buried underneath all the car & building explosions. Movies like this give the sci-fi genre a bad name. The Island could have been an improvement on ideas that Gattaca and The Matrix proposed but….

6) Eros (trio of three films):

a) The Hand (directed by Wai Kar Wong): Rating 8/10

If I had not seen In the Mood for Love or 2046, I might have liked this movie a bit better. But truthfully even though the movie comes off as erotic, in the end, it is just not that great. A young tailor apprentice (Chen Chang) visits a prostitute (the beautiful Gong Li). The touch of her hand on his genitals convinces the boy that he wants to be a tailor. From then on, the boy also becomes the woman’s exclusive tailor. He hears her sleeping with other men but is never able to touch her. Yet their invisible touch is more sensual than all the men who have touched her.

b) Equilibrium (directed by Steven Soderberg): Rating 3/10

There is nothing to mention in this pointless effort of a movie.

c) The Dangerous Thread of Things (directed by Michelangelo Antonioni): Rating 2/10

Two naked woman. One confused man. More nudity. A beach. Boring!

7) Non Ti Muovere (Don’t Move, directed by Sergio Castellito): Rating 7/10

A technically good movie about one man’s affair! Correction. One man’s repeated rape of a woman which turns into an affair. A lot of positive comments for this movie revolve around Penelope Cruz’s acting. Sure her acting is good but what is the point?

8) Tokyo Raiders (2000 movie directed by Jingle Ma): Rating 5.5/10
A man does now show up for his wedding. The fiancée goes to his apartment to find out what happened to him. There she meets the apartment’s interior designer who is there to collect his unpaid bills. Together they head to Tokyo to find the missing man. There they are chased by thugs. But when a private investigator rescues them, he discloses a bigger conspiracy that the missing man was involved in. The usual flashy fights are there but an average movie overall.

Foreign Movie Galore..oh and two Canadian ones as well..

1) Coup De Torchon (1981 movie directed by Bertrand Tavernier): Rating 8/10

The English title of this interesting French movie is ‘Clean Slate’. And that is exactly what the main characters sets out to do – wipe all the corrupt people in his West African town and start fresh again. Tavernier adapted the story of this movie from an American novel by Jim Thompson called Pop. 1280. The story was moved from Southern American to a West African town. And it adapts perfectly. A corrupt police officer wanders around the town doing nothing to protect the black slaves from the rich white French residents. And then one day, he snaps. After a constant barrage of insults from the rich French elite, Lucien Cordier (played brilliantly by Philippe Noiret) starts killing people off one by one. Oh and thrown in the mix is Lucien’s affair with Rose (Isabelle Huppert) and Anne, the cute school teacher. Ofcourse, this is in between handling his wife and his strange brother in-law.

2) Knife in the Water (1962 movie directed by Roman Polanski): Rating 7/10

Roman Polanski’s first movie is a very interesting effort. With only three actors and a minimal production, Polanski manages to construct an interesting moral crime thriller. A well do couple is on their way to the lake. On the way, they pick up a young hitch-hiker. The husband invites the hitch-hiker on their boat journey over the lake. The husband pushes the young boy around and treats him like a servant. During a skirmish, the husband pushes the boy off the boat. Is the boy dead? No, but the husband thinks so.

The movie is decently acted and not bad at all.

3) British Comedy Series: Coupling, Season One – Rating 9/10

Hilarious. Watching season one of this Brit series was a fun experience. The series can best be described as ‘Friends’ meets ‘Sex and the City’. The series is clean but the jokes are much more adventurous than they would have been if this was an American tv series.

4) Un, deux, trios, soleil (1993 movie directed by Bertrand Blier): Rating 8/10

How do you rate a movie which is not linear and may all be a dream? None the less, this is one of the most original and interesting movies I have seen. The opening sequence goes something like this:

A young girl is eating bread and having her soup. Her mother constantly asks her daughter if the soup is to her liking. Finally, the girl gets tired of her mother’s nagging and leaves for school. But her mother chases the daughter down the streets and keeps harassing her. The mother attends the girl’s classes in place of her and sits down with all the kids. The teacher is surprised and when she inquires what the mother is doing there, she gets a nonsensical answer back. When the teacher leaves the class, she is chased by the school teenagers who try to rape her. The young girl comes to the teachers aid and gets a cop to pull over. When the cop is handling the kids, a bunch of 8-10 year olds drive away with the cops car. The cop shoots blindly and manages to hit one of the young kids. The other kids take the wounded boy to the cop’s home to see his wife. The cop’s wife removes her clothes and rubs the wounded boy on her naked body. After that, the boy is cured of his wound and fit again.

Sound crazy? It is. But once the movie settles in, you can describe the dream and real sequences and by the end things make much more sense. Hilarious performances by Marcello Mastroianni, Anouk Grinberg, Olivier Martinez.

5) The Man Without a Past (2002 movie directed by Aki Kaurismaki): Rating 10/10

What a perfect movie! A man is traveling in a train with a single suitcase. When he gets off a station, he is beaten up by a bunch of thugs and his money and personal belongings are taken away. When he wakes up, the man does not know who he is or where he is. So he drifts around and tries to start his life again. He befriends another guy by the container yard near the lake (the poor people live in make shift houses made out of the metal containers). This is just a charming movie and yet it is both tragic and funny at the same time. Perfection!

6) Puteri Gunung Ledang (2004 Malay movie directed by Teong Hin Saw): Rating 6.5/10

This was my first Malaysian movie. The title roughly translates to ‘The Princess of Mount Ledang’. The love story (based on a Malay myth?) is quite simple but drags on for 145 minutes. A princess falls in love with a Malay warrior. However, a rival kingdom’s young king wants the princess for himself and sends the warrior to get the princess. The princess is hiding on top of Mount Ledang waiting for her true love – the warrior. In defiance to the young prince, the princess is willing to marry another rival kingdom’s king to save her kingdom from the clutches of the young king. Beautifully shot but the story is just too long to sustain continued interest.

7) Apaga Y Vamonos (Switch Off, a documentary by Manel Mayol): Rating 9/10

A riveting documentary on globalization and the evils of modern corporations! This time the arena is Chile and the problem is control of natural resources and water. 67% of Chile’s water supply is controlled by a Spanish company. How is such a thing possible? It is and this power control of nature is happening all over the world. Manel Mayol’s movie is engaging and chilling. The visuals are captured perfectly as well.

8) The Battle of Algiers (1965 movie directed by Gillo Pontecorvo, who also co-wrote the movie with Franco Solinas): Rating 11/10

This is one of the best movies I have ever seen! Period! Very few movies will ever come close to this realistic fiction movie which feels like a documentary. In fact, the first release of the movie had a note which stated that no documentary footage was used in this movie. Pontecorvo captures the feelings and sentiments of an oppressed people and their means to gain independence perfectly. This movie is more relevant today than any other movie. After 130 years of French control, the Algerian people are aching for freedom. So they start their mini revolution. Which leads to a counter reaction from the French who don’t want to leave the country. The situations escalate to a point of total collapse. And then everything is all quiet. For 2 years. After which the people start revolting again. Every scene, every dialogue in this movie is perfect. I had to shake my head and think that this movie was made in 1965 and not in the present day. WOW!

9) It’s all gone Pete Tong (Directed by Michael Dowse): Rating 7.5/10

Canadian (Calgary) Dowse’s second feature is a mocumentary like his first flick (Fubar).
This time Dowse takes the title name from a real life character, Pete Tong and even gives Pete Tong a tiny role in the movie. Pete Tong is a DJ in the Spanish island of Ibiza, a popular holiday spot for British people. In the movie, the main character Frankie Wilde (Paul Kaye) is a popular DJ in Ibiza. However, Frankie’s excess life style of music, drugs takes its toll on his ears – as in his is going deaf. He has only 20% of hearing left in one ear and eventually due to freak accident he goes completely deaf. After a long self imposed exile, Frankie returns. He finds a way to spin music again – he can feel the vibrations of the amps and read the graphs on his laptop. Along with the help of a Portuguese woman, Frankie learns to lip read as well. Once again, Frankie is the best. And then just like that, Frankie disappears.

It is a well done movie. The only complain is that it gets drabby in some parts but for a few stale scenes, it is fresh and original.

10) Fubar (Directed by Michael Dowse): Rating 6.5/10

Michael Dowse’s mocumentary on headbangers won rave reviews in Sundance and is a cult classic in its own right. The story surrounds two Calgary based headbangers who live their life to the fullest – rock and roll, drinking, fighting and smashing. A documentary film-maker (Gordon Skilling) decides to make a film about the two characters – Terry (David Lawrence) and Dean (Paul Spence). Either one loves this movie or one doesn’t. One can call it a mesh of Spinal-tap and Wayne’s World. It is a well done for a tiny of budget of $25,000. But I was not floored by it.

Dogville takes a bite

1) Dogville (directed by Lars Von Trier): Rating 8.5/10

What a strange movie Dogville is! First off the three hour long movie is shot on a stage like fake set, with chalk lines outlining houses, boundaries, streets and even a dog. There are some doors, a bell, a curtain, a fake mountain, wooden beams depicting a coal mine, and a window or two. Once you get beyond the stage like atmosphere, you start sinking into the movie. That is unless you have left the theatre or switched the tv off already.
What is the story? The entire drama takes place in a fictitious tiny American town of Dogville, a town of about 15 people, where nothing ever happens. The coal mine was shut down long ago and the people go about their daily lives with mixed emotions. And then one day, Grace (Nicole Kidman) enters the town. She is on the run from a mobster and is given shelter by Tom Edison Junior (Paul Bettany). Tom takes a liking to Grace and manages to convince the rest of the town folk to let stay. At first, the town folk are hesitant, but eventually grow to like her. They find a use for her, and end up burdening her with extra work. And with time, the town folk start abusing Grace’s kindness to fulfill their own pleasures – the men find her as a sexual outlet, the women as a scorn of hate, etc. The entire human behaviour spectrum is shown in the cycle of the movie – at first the town folk fear the stranger, then they like the stranger and find a use for the stranger, then the use turns to misuse, and then they are back to fearing and disliking the stranger. Finally the stranger is considered more worthless than a dog and chained. All throughout the movie, Grace tries to remain calm and considers the town folk as human. Yet, when things finally reach a dead end, Grace unleashes her wrath.

So why is this movie so hated? Most American critics slammed this movie as being ‘anti-American’. That is the most absurd criticism of this movie as there is nothing Anti-American in this movie. This story could have taken place in any city in any country in the World. The raw emotions and human behavior in the story as so basic that they transcend national boundaries. The acting is what keeps this movie interesting. If the acting was not up to par, then this movie would have been painful to watch. What about the fake sets? Well after a while, it does not matter. The movie is like a theatre stage play, and the set design is not really much of an issue.

My real problem with the movie is the final 20 minutes. Near the end, when Grace finally meets the mobster again, the scene is so poorly written that it is a disappointment. If there was any scene which should have been strongest, it should have been that final confrontation. But for some reason, Von Trier brought out tired and boring dialogues for that scene. And the ending was not totally unexpected. There was no other direction the movie could have taken. My only other question is what if Grace was not on the run from a mobster? What is no mobster came back to get her? How would have she have survived? I think by using a gangster element in the story, Von Trier got out of answering a tough question. His movie might have been much more haunting if Grace was left to remain like a ‘dog’. None the less, this is a movie unlike any other.

2) Killer’s Kiss (1955 movie directed by Stanley Kubrick):

I was looking forward to seeing this movie but due to time restrictions I could not finish this film noir. The start didn’t look too bad but I will have to wait another day.

Some festival movies:

3) Noise (directed by Tony Spiridakis): Rating 8.5/10

This is a neat little independent thriller. A recently divorced woman (Trish Goff) moves into a quiet apartment complex to start a new life. However, she soon discovers that the only other person living in the building is quite a noisy neighbour. Her neighbour plays loud music beyond 4 am, and Joyce can’t get any sleep. So she goes up and leaves a note underneath the noisy neighbour’s door. The next day, the neighbour Charlotte (Ally Sheedy) pays Joyce a visit and apologizes. But after a little quiet, Charlotte returns to her old ways. Joyce starts going crazy, and tries to hatch a plan to quieten Charlotte. However, the plan backfires and Charlotte becomes more noisy. Charlotte takes revenge in getting Joyce fired from her job and combined with the noise, Joyce’s life starts falling apart. She takes to drinking and is heading for disaster, until a twist manages to turn things around. The end comes as a shock but given the dark undertone of this movie, it is not unexpected.

4) EMR (directed and written by James Erskine, Danny McCullough): Rating 7/10

An independent conspiracy theory movie from the UK! Adam is a conspiracy theory buff and one day finds his life turned upside down. He wakes up to find himself in Mexico with stitches on the side of his body (playing on the Kidney stolen myths) and after running around, faints and awakens back in London. He wakes up alternatively in San Francisco and London with no idea what is happening to him. The movie contains all the common urban myths and various conspiracy theories but the movie is not fast paced or very polished. Still it is worthy for a watch!

5) In the Shoes of the Dragon (Documentary directed by Hronn Sveinsdottir and Arni Sveinsson):

Rating: Technical quality of the movie (3/10), Movie Merit (9/10)

This is a wicked movie! Unfortunately I have to rate this differently. The movie has terrible cinematography and editing yet the underlying story is worthy. Hronn decides to enter Miss Iceland 2000 to show how fake beauty pageants are. She plans to film the entire thing but realizes it would be difficult to participate and make a movie at the same time. So she gets the help of Arni to handle the camera. However, neither people are professional film-makers and that shows in the camera work. That being said, the story behind Miss Iceland is very interesting. Hronn soon finds herself caught up in the contest and her personality changes right before the camera – she goes from an easy going person to a mean spirited person. Ofcourse, every person has mean parts to their personality but the movie shows how a competitive environment nourishes her evil side more than her sweetness. Overall, her expressions and vibrant personality make this a fun documentary.

Notes: Iceland is a country of less than 300,000 people (approx. 293,000) yet they have produced three Miss World’s in the last 4 decades. Claudia Schiffer is invited to crown Miss Iceland 2000 and the reigning Miss World from 1999 (Miss India) also makes an appearance.

Craziness in July

1) Crash (directed by Paul Haggis): Rating 10/10

Either you like this movie or despise it. But one can’t discount director and writer Paul Haggis’s attempt. Like Gurinder Chada’s What’s Cooking, Crash shows an ethnic side to Los Angeles. In Crash, Latin Americans, Koreans, Persians, White, Black collide and brush past each other as they make do with their daily hardships. One of the biggest criticism of this movie has to with the fact that virtually all the encounters are dipped in racism. Is that a right portrayal? Yes in the movie’s framework. The movie shows the stressful moments in various characters lives and when they are pushed against the wall, their anger and fears come to the forefront. And it is in these situations when racism rears its ugly head – when people try to use racist remarks to put the other person down.
The movie moves at a good pace and the acting is top notch. Loads of stars make little cameos and all the roles have an important place in the structure. Not to be missed!

2) One Night in Mongkok (Directed by Tung-Shing Yee): Rating 7/10

Mongkok is one of the most crowded areas in Hong Kong. The story starts off when two rival gangs clash and one of the gang leader’s son is killed. So the other leader wants revenge. A contract killer is hired (by a middle man) to finish the job. But this contract killer is from a small village and finds himself as a pawn in between the person who hired him and Hong Kong police who want to shut the violence down. Not a bad movie, but nothing spectacular either.

3) Oldboy (Directed by Chan-wook Park): Rating 9/10

A man is imprisoned in an apartment for 15 years without any reason or explanation. So when he gets out, he goes out to seek revenge on those put him there and those who tortured him on a day to day basis. The movie is not a violent revenge movie but has a story which plays out like a puzzle thriller (sure there are some fight scenes). And the reason for the imprisonment is completely unexpected and comes as a shock. Chan-wook Park’s follows up with another stellar movie like his earlier Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance (2002).

Note: Hollywood is remaking this movie next year. That is just plain pathetic. Why do they have to remake almost all the recent Asian hits? Have they really run out of ideas?

4) Three: Extremes (sequel to Three, a collection of 3 short films made back in 2002):

This time around, directors Takashi Miike, Chan-wook Park and Fruit Chan serve up three short films. All three movies are shot/edited very well. But not all are equal.

a) ‘Box’ by Miike: The less said about this the better. Quite boring and weakest of all three segments. Disappointing by Miike’s standards but he does try different stuff every now and then.

b) ‘Dumplings’ by Chan: This one was apparently cut down from 90 minutes to a shorter version to fit in between the two other director’s movies. For a change, I thought a line had been crossed in this movie. Like a Twilight Zone episode, this one features a woman who serves up the best dumplings because of her secret ingredient – aborted human fetuses. Yup, that’s right. Apparently eating bits of these aborted fetus help preserve women’s skin and make them look young. So what was the line? The choice of the secret ingredient! Other sources on the net are praising the story but I don’t think the selection of the secret ingredient was a requirement for this movie or it helped in shaping the story.

c) ‘Cut’ by Park: This is the best of the lot. By a long shot! A famous director awakens to find himself tied to the wall. His wife is tied and tangled in a web of strings by her piano. The intruder offers the director a choice – either he kill a young girl or he will chop one of his wife’s fingers every 5 minutes. None of the gore is shown in this one but the acting from the intruder and director is very good here.

5) Fantastic Four (directed by Tim Story): Rating 7/10

This movie has been heavily trashed from all fronts. But despite all the movie’s faults – script problems, poor acting, technical inconsistencies, I enjoyed this flick. The characters of Human Torch (played with tons of enthusiasm by Chris Evans) and the Thing (Michael Chiklis) are the best played and acted characters of the lot. Reed Richards (Ioan Gruffudd) is very poor and Sue Storm (Jessica Alba) is only mildly better. Dr. Doom (Julian McMahon) looks the most polished but is made out to be clear villain, as opposed to giving him more substance. So I am probably the only person out there who is giving this movie such a high rating, but it was short and enjoyable. And I don’t this is the worst of the recent comic book movies – 2003’s Daredevil is still one of the worst. Ofcourse, I have not seen Catwoman or Elektra.

Singing in July

1) Parineeta (directed by Pradeep Sarkar): Rating 8/10

What does one do with the songs? With the exception of Sarfarosh (1999), I can’t conceive of giving a Bollywood movie a perfect rating if it has useless songs. And unfortunately, Parineeta does have some needless music numbers. That being said, the movie starts off amazingly. The crisp voice of Amitabh Bachchan (who else has such a voice?) introduces us to the vibrant city of Calcutta. The visuals are stunning in that opening sequence and all throughout the movie. The cinematography is spot on as the lens blur the characters we don’t want to see, and focus on the expressions we should be interested in.

The story is based on the 1930’s Calcutta novel which means that it is a love story about unrequited love and about upper class Indians laying around balancing their life between the leftovers of colonial India and modern India, while filling their time with some activity. In this case, the activity is music. Childhood friends Shekhar (Saif Ali) and Lolita (Vidya Balan) grow up to develop a very close and intimate understanding, and Lolita even helps to co-compose Shekhar’s music. But problems of jealousy arise when Shekhar’s father tries to get him married off to a rich girl and Girish (Sanjay Dutt) enters the frame. But surprisingly the ending is a happy one. All’s well that ends well.

The movie length is just 2 hours and 7 minutes but the few needless songs make it feel longer. The story is adapted to be set in the 1960’s but a few clothes are taken straight from modern day: did women wear short suits back in the 1960’s? I don’t think so. And Shekhar is showing wearing modern day sun shades and turtleneck sweaters. I know these are minor points but they stick out. The acting of all the main leads is very good with the only exception being the role of Shekhar’s mother.

Anyway much better than a typical Bollywood movie but not a perfect one though.

2) Les Choristes (The Chorus, directed by Christophe Barratier): Rating 7/10

The biggest problem with this movie is something which is not the movie’s fault – the story of a new teacher bringing the best out of an unmanageable bunch of kids has been used so much in Hollywood that it looks stale, even if the movie is in French. A teacher takes up a job in a boarding school where all the children are ill-disciplined and unruly. The school principle believes in an action-reaction method, meaning for every student’s violent action, there should be an equally violent reaction in return. The new teacher, Clement Mathieu (Gerard Jugnot) notices that this action-reaction approach will never solve the situation so he tries to reason with the students. He discovers that most students in his class have a talent for singing. So he takes up music again (he had vowed to forget music) to help find a way to better the students. The movie is very good on all fronts: acting, directing, music, editing, and cinematography. But the story didn’t appeal too much and after a while, it gets boring.